Legal Columns

법률칼럼

법무법인 마중 변호사들이 직접 쓰는 법률 칼럼·해설을 모았습니다.

법률칼럼Legal Insight2026. 05. 19

When is a Response to an Immigration Control Act Violation Necessary?

  In recent years, investigations and penalties related to violations of the Immigration Control Act have been noticeably strengthened.   Even minor overstays, failures to report, or involvement in criminal cases are all being referred to immigration offense review, and the system has shifted to one in which departure measures are considered much more quickly than in the past.   The problem is that many foreign nationals miss the appropriate timing to respond to an Immigration Control Act violation. Not a few only recognize the seriousness of the situation after the immigration offense review has already begun.    

Contents

 
1. What Is a Violation of the Immigration Control Act?
 
2. What Is the Biggest Problem When an Immigration Control Act Violation Occurs?
 
3. What Is the Immigration Offense Review Process?
 
4. What Should You Do First If an Immigration Control Act Violation Occurs?
 
5. Is It Possible to Maintain Stay Status Despite an Immigration Control Act Violation?
 
6. Responding to an Immigration Control Act Violation Is Not Just Paperwork.
   

1. What Is a Violation of the Immigration Control Act?

  A violation of the Immigration Control Act refers to a situation in which a foreign national fails to comply with obligations prescribed by law during their period of stay.   Even minor administrative mistakes can, if accumulated, become subject to immigration offense review.   The following are representative examples of violations:
  • Overstaying the permitted period of stay
  • False reporting or sham marriage
  • False statements in entry records
  • Failure to respond after involvement in a criminal case
  If proper action is not taken at this stage, maintaining lawful stay itself may become difficult.    

2. What Is the Biggest Problem When an Immigration Control Act Violation Occurs?

  The biggest issue is that it does not end with a simple fine. Separate from criminal penalties or administrative fines, the Immigration Office simultaneously conducts an administrative decision process called an immigration offense review.   This offense review is not merely a fact-finding procedure; it is a stage at which the authorities reassess whether the foreign national should be allowed to continue staying in Korea.   Possible outcomes actually considered in an immigration offense review include:
  • Refusal of extension of stay
  • Denial of change of status of stay
  • Deportation order and designation of a departure deadline
  • Imposition of a re-entry ban for a certain period
  A particularly important point is that administrative measures may be imposed separately even after fines or criminal penalties have already been concluded.   Therefore, in Immigration Control Act violation cases, the key is to set the response direction not after a disposition is issued, but at the stage before the immigration offense review begins.    

3. What Is the Immigration Offense Review Process?

  The immigration offense review is an official procedure conducted by the Immigration Office to determine whether a foreign national can continue residing in Korea. It is not a simple reference inquiry but a critical stage that decides whether stay can be maintained.   In an immigration offense review, the following factors are comprehensively examined:
  • The circumstances of the violation and the degree of intent
  • Length of stay in Korea and establishment of a life base
  • Likelihood of repeat violations
  • Whether there is any connection to criminal cases
  If a clear response strategy to an Immigration Control Act violation is not established during this process, it may lead to an unfavorable decision.    

4. What Should You Do First If an Immigration Control Act Violation Occurs?

  If an immigration violation has been identified, the first thing to do is understand the overall structure of the situation.   Making statements or submitting documents based solely on your own judgment can be risky.   Key points to check:
  • Whether the case is still before investigation or already after the start of an immigration offense review
  • Whether it is linked to a criminal case
  • Whether there remains any possibility of changing the status of stay
  The direction of the response at this stage can greatly influence the eventual outcome.   One of the most common mistakes people make when dealing with an immigration violation is assuming that paying a fine will resolve everything.   In reality, many cases proceed after the fine to an immigration offense review, notification of a departure order, or inability to change stay status.   To prevent such situations, it is advisable to prepare strategically from the stage before the immigration offense review begins.    

5. Is It Possible to Maintain Stay Status Despite an Immigration Control Act Violation?

  Depending on the circumstances, maintaining lawful stay is entirely possible.   Not every violation automatically leads to deportation, and outcomes can vary according to how the case is assessed during the immigration offense review stage.   The key factors influencing the possibility of maintaining stay are as follows:
  • The circumstances in which the violation occurred and whether there was intent
  • What materials and explanations were submitted during the offense review process
  • Whether the administrative decision criteria of the immigration authorities are accurately understood
  This is not a procedure that looks only at legal provisions. It is an administrative decision-making process that comprehensively evaluates the foreign national’s life base in Korea, likelihood of reoffending, and willingness to improve.   Therefore, responding to an Immigration Control Act violation is not merely a matter of experience; outcomes differ depending on how accurately one understands immigration practice standards and the decision-making framework.    

6. Responding to an Immigration Control Act Violation Is Not Just Paperwork.

  To change the outcome, criminal penalties, administrative measures, and immigration offense review must be analyzed as a single, connected process.   At Majung Law Firm, we handle Immigration Control Act violation and offense review cases in a structured manner based on:
  • A defense team including attorneys with prior experience in Immigration Office investigation divisions
  • Integrated analysis of criminal and immigration administrative procedures
  • Numerous cases where clients facing deportation were able to maintain lawful stay
  • A multilingual system (including English and Chinese) enabling communication without language barriers
  Are you currently facing concerns related to an Immigration Control Act violation? This is not an issue to be addressed later—it requires setting the right direction now. We recommend seeking solutions together with qualified legal counsel.     Multilingual consultation available in English and Chinese.   Professional interpreters assist from the first consultation to the conclusion of the case.   Offices in Seoul, Daejeon, Busan, Daegu, and Gwangju   Don’t face the legal system alone. Let Majung fight for you!
       

상담 신청하기