If you believe that a fine is the end of the matter, that assumption is only half correct.
In practice, there are many cases in which individuals receive a departure order from the Immigration Office even when they have merely overstayed their permitted period of stay by a short time or worked briefly at the request of an employer. In particular, prior offenses classified as posing social risk—such as drunk driving, drug-related crimes, or sexual offenses—may trigger a separate review by the Ministry of Justice to determine whether forced deportation is warranted, even after the criminal penalty has been fully served.
These administrative measures are conducted independently of the outcome of criminal proceedings by the immigration authorities. Their results may be directly reflected as negative factors in future applications for extension of stay or changes in visa status.
The critical issue is that, at the very moment when individuals believe their case has been resolved, administrative procedures that strip them of their immigration status may instead begin.
Therefore, for those seeking to avoid departure orders or deportation measures resulting from violations of the Immigration Control Act, it is essential to obtain the assistance of a legal professional from the earliest stage of the process.
Contents
1. Violations of the Immigration Control Act Apply to a Broader Range of Situations Than You Might Expect
2. Even After Criminal Penalties, Administrative Procedures Continue
3. Departure Orders and Deportation Do Not Have to Be Accepted Without Challenge
4. Mitigating Entry Bans After Deportation for Violating a Departure Order
5. If Maintaining Your Legal Stay Is Essential, Now Is the Time to Prepare Your Response
1. Violations of the Immigration Control Act Apply to a Broader Range of Situations Than You Might Expect
There are confirmed cases in which even a simple overstay has been deemed a violation of the Immigration Control Act.
Because the eligibility requirements and permitted scope of activities for foreign nationals staying in Korea are defined in far more detail than many realize, violations may be recognized in situations such as the following:
- Remaining in Korea after visa expiration without applying for an extension may be classified as illegal stay.
- Engaging in income-generating activities without work authorization, or illegally employing foreign nationals, is also subject to punishment.
- A criminal record resulting in fines or imprisonment for offenses such as drunk driving, assault, or drug-related crimes may negatively affect immigration status reviews.
- Prior convictions involving drug offenses or sexual crimes may be deemed grounds for forced deportation regardless of visa type.
In particular, even cases involving only fines may lead the Ministry of Justice to classify an individual as a “foreign national subject to deportation,” depending on the amount and frequency of the penalties.
What may have been considered a minor or insignificant record can ultimately become the decisive factor leading to forced removal, and this risk should not be underestimated.
2. Even After Criminal Penalties, Administrative Procedures Continue
Many people assume that once a court sentence is finalized, the case is over. However, violations of the Immigration Control Act do not end there.
Even after criminal punishment has been imposed, the Ministry of Justice conducts a separate administrative review to reassess whether the individual is eligible to remain in Korea. In particular, even cases resulting only in fines may become decisive grounds for forced deportation.
Criminal Penalties
If a foreign national overstays the permitted period of stay or engages in activities not allowed under their visa, they may be subject to criminal punishment. In practice, there are cases where fines amounting to several million won or even imprisonment are imposed.
In addition, if an employer knowingly hires a foreign national whose visa does not permit employment, the employer may be held liable to the same extent.
Administrative Measures
Separate from court rulings, the Immigration Office may immediately initiate departure order or deportation procedures if it determines that the individual fails to meet the standards for lawful stay.
In particular, any of the following conditions may be treated as warning signs:
- Total fines of KRW 5 million or more within the past five years
- Two or more fines within the past two years
- A single fine of KRW 3 million or more, even once
These criteria are not used merely to review criminal history, but rather to assess the appropriateness of continued stay and the level of social risk. Because immigration status may be revoked solely by administrative decision, these measures can have a more immediate and severe impact than criminal penalties.
Disadvantages Following Deportation
Once a deportation order is issued, re-entry into Korea is often restricted for several years, and serious offenses such as drug or sexual crimes may result in permanent entry bans. In many real-world cases, administrative immigration measures prove far more severe than the criminal sentence itself.
3. Departure Orders and Deportation Do Not Have to Be Accepted Without Challenge
Even when a violation of the Immigration Control Act is confirmed, not all cases result in forced deportation.
Because administrative discretion applies to immigration measures, departure orders may be suspended or deportation orders themselves may be withdrawn if the necessity of continued stay and the individual’s genuine intent to resettle are sufficiently demonstrated.
In practice, the following factors are given significant weight:
Family Relationship Evidence
- Marriage to a Korean national
- Actual responsibility for child care and educational stability
- Illness or medical treatment needs of family members'
Evidence Demonstrating Efforts to Prevent Reoffending
- Traffic offenses: completion of education programs, written statements of remorse
- Drug offenses: counseling or treatment records, psychological evaluation results
- Sexual offenses: risk assessment reports, completion of rehabilitation programs
Efforts to Resolve and Repair Harm to Victims
- Settlement agreements, letters of appeal, records of compensation or restitution
Proof of Social Integration and Contribution
- Continued employment, self-employment operation, tax payment records
- Long-term residence history and participation in local community activities
These materials are submitted during the Immigration Offender Review process and, depending on the case, may also serve as key grounds for judgment in administrative litigation.
However, the critical point is that such materials must not be merely listed, but rather structured and presented in a manner aligned with the facts of the case and the individual’s circumstances of stay.
4. Mitigating Entry Bans After Deportation for Violating a Departure Order
The client, a Vietnamese national, received a departure order after a past criminal case resulting in a fine led to a finding of a violation of the Immigration Control Act.
While the client was challenging the decision through an administrative appeal, the departure deadline elapsed because a separate application for suspension of execution had not been filed. As a result, the client was deemed to be illegally staying in Korea, which led to the issuance of a forced deportation order. Recognizing the seriousness of the situation, the client sought legal representation and initiated an administrative lawsuit, simultaneously applying for suspension of execution, which temporarily halted the enforcement of the deportation order.
Legal counsel demonstrated, with supporting evidence, that the client had promptly paid the fine, had no subsequent criminal record, and had maintained residence in Korea, while also explaining the family’s circumstances of stay in Korea. In addition, counsel argued procedural illegality, pointing out that the deportation order failed to specify concrete reasons and cited ambiguous statutory provisions.
In response, the administrative authority maintained that the measures were justified due to the failure to comply with the departure order. However, following further negotiations, the case was ultimately resolved with the client voluntarily departing Korea on a scheduled date, while the period of re-entry ban was minimized.
5. If Maintaining Your Legal Stay Is Essential, Now Is the Time to Prepare Your Response
Once a violation of the Immigration Control Act is confirmed, the process typically proceeds so that a departure order is issued immediately after criminal punishment.
If one responds without adequate preparation or fails to properly assemble the necessary documentation at this stage, it may become difficult to even secure a meaningful opportunity to challenge a forced deportation order.
With the joint involvement of legal representatives experienced in Immigration Office practice and criminal defense matters, the case is handled through a careful review of what materials must be prepared from the earliest stage and what legal arguments can be used to establish eligibility for continued stay.
If there remains any possibility of maintaining lawful stay, it is still possible to define and prepare an effective response strategy starting now.
Multilingual consultation available in English and Chinese.
Professional interpreters assist from the first consultation to the conclusion of the case.
Offices in Seoul, Daejeon, Busan, Daegu, and Gwangju
Don’t face the legal system alone. Let Majung fight for you!
